It needed 1Mb, if you didnt have 1Mb contiguous chunk of memory you will get an error. The error was in the channel allocation which is done on the target database
On 17/07/06, John P Weatherman <asahoshi@(protected)> wrote: > > Not yet. The 1.5 is still larger than what the error is complaining > about and it is on the target, not the catalog, and the errors says it's > a RPC error, which makes it look like the catalog is the problem. Have > you seen something like this to make you think it is actually the > target? >
It needed 1Mb, if you didnt have 1Mb contiguous chunk of memory you will get an error. The error was in the channel allocation which is done on the target database<br><br> <div><span class="gmail_quote">On 17/07/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">John P Weatherman</b> <<a href="mailto:asahoshi@(protected)">asahoshi@(protected) .net</a>> wrote:</span> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0 .8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Not yet. The 1.5 is still larger than what the error is complaining<br>about and it is on the target, not the catalog, and the errors says it's <br>a RPC error, which makes it look like the catalog is the problem. Have<br>you seen something like this to make you think it is actually the <br>target?<br></blockquote></div>